Bengaluru Public Works Explorer Koramangala

← All cases

Case file · KP6-304-15-000371

needs RTI

Payments above contract value

KP6-304-15-000371 · confidence medium · priority score 56.3/100 (ranking aid, not a judgement)

Project

Improvements and Development of Beauty Spot Park in Koramangala.

Job 304-15-000371 · Parks & playgrounds · location not stated · Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

Contractor: B Y Perumaiah · paid to, per IFMS bills: B Y Perumaiah ₹1.28 Cr (2018-03-17 → 2018-09-15); M/s Tejus Consultants ₹2.20 L (2019-01-25 → 2019-06-20); Sri.Perumaiah ₹65.93 L (2019-05-17 → 2019-05-17)

Project page with every fact and source →

What was promised

Contract / work-order value
₹1.41 Cr (inferred)
Estimate
—
Work order
—
Stipulated completion
—

What happened

Paid (gross / net)
₹1.96 Cr / ₹1.22 Cr
Bills
5 · 20 Mar 2018 → 03 Jul 2019
Final bill
20 Jun 2019
Status
Completed (final bill)
Extensions of time
1 extension-of-time order(s): to 2019-05-10

Why this case deserves follow-up

Payments above contract value (unexplained in public record, medium confidence)
Gross payments of ₹1.96 Cr are 139% of the ₹1.41 Cr contract value from the work order (GST explains up to ~118%). No document explaining the difference was found in the public records examined.

Examined and set aside on this project:

  • document reuse (artefact): the only file shared with other jobs is a 'Not Applicable' placeholder PDF.

Possible legitimate explanations

  • Further work orders or a supplementary agreement under the same job.
  • Escalation / price adjustment.
  • GST and statutory additions above a contract value quoted without them.
  • The approval exists on paper but was not uploaded to IFMS (IFMS attachments are not a complete record).

What would resolve it

  • All work orders and supplementary agreements under the job
  • Final bill abstract with totals
  • Revised estimate / EIRL

Questions an investigator could ask

  1. List every work order and supplementary agreement issued under job 304-15-000371 with their values.
  2. What explains gross payments of ₹1.96 Cr against a contract value of ₹1.41 Cr?
  3. Was a revised estimate / EIRL approved, and by whom?

Specific records to request (RTI)

  1. All work orders, supplementary agreements and the revised estimate (EIRL) under the job — job 304-15-000371; paid ₹1.96 Cr vs contract ₹1.41 Cr. Why: Identifies the authority for payments above the contract value.

Evidence

IFMS work bills for this job: 152602, 192685, 224601, 248159, 255467

Investigation lead, not an accusation. Every statement on this page is generated from the published case data (JSON).