Bengaluru Public Works Explorer Koramangala

← All cases

Case file · KP6-304-15-000370

set aside

Payments above contract value

KP6-304-15-000370 · confidence high · priority score 33.0/100 (ranking aid, not a judgement)

This project was reviewed and set aside: every issue was explained, was an artefact, or rests only on low-confidence evidence

Project

Improvements and Development of Mesthri Palya Park in Koramangala.

Job 304-15-000370 · Parks & playgrounds · location not stated · Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

Contractor: B.Y. Perumaiah · paid to, per IFMS bills: B.Y. Perumaiah ₹3.49 Cr (2017-04-27 → 2018-02-23); M/s Tejus Consultants ₹11.91 L (2017-08-11 → 2019-06-20); B Y PERUMAIAH ₹2.99 Cr (2019-02-01 → 2019-03-14)

Project page with every fact and source →

What was promised

Contract / work-order value
₹3.00 Cr (inferred)
Estimate
—
Work order
—
Stipulated completion
—

What happened

Paid (gross / net)
₹6.61 Cr / ₹2.91 Cr
Bills
9 · 11 May 2017 → 03 Jul 2019
Final bill
14 Mar 2019
Status
Completed (final bill)

Why this case deserves follow-up

Examined and set aside on this project:

  • paid over contract (explained): the job carries 3 work orders (₹3.51 Cr, ₹4.2 L, ₹3.00 Cr, total ₹6.55 Cr); payments of ₹6.61 Cr are 101% of that total. The earlier signal compared payments with only one work order.
  • document reuse (artefact): the only file shared with other jobs is a 'Not Applicable' placeholder PDF.

Possible legitimate explanations

  • Further work orders or a supplementary agreement under the same job.
  • Escalation / price adjustment.
  • GST and statutory additions above a contract value quoted without them.
  • The approval exists on paper but was not uploaded to IFMS (IFMS attachments are not a complete record).

What would resolve it

  • All work orders and supplementary agreements under the job
  • Final bill abstract with totals
  • Revised estimate / EIRL

Questions an investigator could ask

  1. List every work order and supplementary agreement issued under job 304-15-000370 with their values.
  2. What explains gross payments of ₹6.61 Cr against a contract value of ₹3.00 Cr?
  3. Was a revised estimate / EIRL approved, and by whom?

Specific records to request (RTI)

  1. All work orders, supplementary agreements and the revised estimate (EIRL) under the job — job 304-15-000370; paid ₹6.61 Cr vs contract ₹3.00 Cr. Why: Identifies the authority for payments above the contract value.

Evidence

    IFMS work bills for this job: 83007, 103567, 144514, 149252, 149260, 226036, 226668, 236958, 255476

    Investigation lead, not an accusation. Every statement on this page is generated from the published case data (JSON).