Case file · KP6-186-23-000001
set asideBilled quantity above Schedule B
This project was reviewed and set aside: every issue was explained, was an artefact, or rests only on low-confidence evidence
Project
Comprehensive Balance Development & Improvements to Multipurpose Building & Construction of Kitchen in Tank Bund Road, Tavarekere, additional improvements to Kuvempu Park Multipurpose Building & other Improvements to Parks & Playground in BTM Layout Assmebly Constituency (Package 10)
Job 186-23-000001 · Buildings & civic facilities · Tavarekere · Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
Contractor: DASARADHA RAMI REDDY · paid to, per IFMS bills: DASARADHA RAMI REDDY ₹15.45 Cr (2024-05-16 → 2025-11-07); H & P CONSULTANTS ₹4.95 L (2025-07-01 → 2025-07-01); STRUCTIAL CONSULTANT ₹12.15 L (2025-07-01 → 2025-07-01)
What was promised
- Contract / work-order value
- ₹13.82 Cr (inferred)
- Estimate
- —
- Work order
- —
- Stipulated completion
- —
What happened
- Paid (gross / net)
- ₹15.63 Cr / ₹14.75 Cr
- Bills
- 5 · 11 Apr 2025 → 08 Apr 2026
- Final bill
- 01 Jul 2025
- Status
- Completed (final bill)
- Deductions
- fine ₹41,800
Why this case deserves follow-up
Examined and set aside on this project:
- quantity above plan (low confidence): the same approved statement covers 2 sibling item(s) (2 → 5 executed; 2 → 5 executed); this item's row is illegible, so it is set aside rather than presented.
- quantity above plan (explained): A work slip / comparative statement records an executed quantity of 5 for the item (billed 4), so the increase is covered by a variation document.
- quantity above plan (explained): A work slip / comparative statement records an executed quantity of 5 for the item (billed 4), so the increase is covered by a variation document.
Possible legitimate explanations
- An approved deviation / work slip increased the quantity.
- The approval exists on paper but was not uploaded to IFMS (IFMS attachments are not a complete record).
- A second installation location was added to the work.
- An OCR misreading of one figure (each row passed quantity × rate = amount, which makes this unlikely).
What would resolve it
- Approved deviation statement / work slip covering the item
- Supplementary Schedule B
- MB pages for the item
- Site inspection counting installed units
Questions an investigator could ask
- Was the increase of 's. Bearings; Maintenance-free self-greased SKF each Borla a.' from 2 to 4 units on job 186-23-000001 approved through a deviation statement or work slip? If so, give the approval number, date and approving authority.
- Which MB pages record the measurement of the additional 2 units?
- Where were the additional units installed?
- Was the additional quantity paid at the tendered rate or a revised rate?
Specific records to request (RTI)
- Approved deviation statement / work slip / supplementary Schedule B covering 's. Bearings; Maintenance-free self-greased SKF each Borla a.' — job 186-23-000001; Schedule B quantity 2, billed 4 @ ₹248,000.00. Why: Shows whether the extra quantity was approved before payment.
- Measurement-book pages recording this item — job 186-23-000001; 4 units cumulative. Why: Shows where and when the additional units were measured.
Evidence
IFMS work bills for this job: 655880, 675632, 727750, 727838, 744341
Investigation lead, not an accusation. Every statement on this page is generated from the published case data (JSON).