Case file · KP6-152-20-000049
set asideSame contract documents under different job numbers
This project was reviewed and set aside: every issue was explained, was an artefact, or rests only on low-confidence evidence
Project
Providing Asphalting improvements to roads, drains and footpath and other development works in Koramangala K R Garden Koramangala Village 14th main Jakkansandra Balajinagara 6th main Maruthinagar roads, Sriramappa layout Dodamuthappa layout, Tavarekere, Madiwala, Mico layout SFHS Layout, MKES college and surrounding areas in ward no 151,173,152,172,and 176 (Old Annexure-2 New Sl No 78 ,79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 70, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77
Job 152-20-000049 · Roads, drains & footpaths (combined) · 14th Main; 6th Main; Tavarekere; Madiwala · Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
Contractor: V M R CONSTRUCTION · paid to, per IFMS bills: H & P CONSULTANTS ₹4.90 L (2021-08-13 → 2021-08-13); V M R CONSTRUCTION ₹9.96 Cr (2022-01-13 → 2022-05-18); INFRA TECHNOCRATS CO ₹4.96 L (2022-12-12 → 2022-12-12)
What was promised
- Contract / work-order value
- not read (unknown)
- Estimate
- —
- Work order
- EE/BTM/WO/ 06 /2021-22 dated ?
- Stipulated completion
- —
What happened
- Paid (gross / net)
- ₹10.06 Cr / ₹9.53 Cr
- Bills
- 7 · 21 Sep 2021 → 29 Mar 2023
- Final bill
- 12 Dec 2022
- Status
- Completed (final bill)
- Pending bills
- 4 bill(s) not paid (₹67,109,421); at: AE ×4
Why this case deserves follow-up
Examined and set aside on this project:
- document reuse (artefact): the only file shared with other jobs is a 'Not Applicable' placeholder PDF.
Possible legitimate explanations
- One contract funded under two job codes (split budget heads).
- A wrong upload (document classification error).
What would resolve it
- Work-order ↔ job-code register for both jobs
- Budget-head allocation for each job
- Bill abstracts of both jobs
Questions an investigator could ask
- Is the agreement attached to job 152-20-000049 the same contract as the one on 151-20-000080? If so, why is it booked under two job numbers?
- How much of the contract value was paid under each job number?
- Is the work described under each job number physically distinct?
Specific records to request (RTI)
- Work-order ↔ job-code mapping and budget-head allocation — job 152-20-000049 and 151-20-000080; same agreement / work order attached to both. Why: Shows whether one contract was split across job numbers.
Evidence
IFMS work bills for this job: 451239, 480724, 480726, 480727, 480728, 493351, 493420, 493422, 494505, 494506, 517182, 557632
Investigation lead, not an accusation. Every statement on this page is generated from the published case data (JSON).