Case file · KP6-151-16-000025
set asideSame contract documents under different job numbers
This project was reviewed and set aside: every issue was explained, was an artefact, or rests only on low-confidence evidence
Project
Asphalting to 1st block Koramangala in ward no151 Koramangala
Job 151-16-000025 · Roads · 1st Block Koramangala · Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
Contractor: Sri. Ramaiah Lokesh
What was promised
- Contract / work-order value
- not read (unknown)
- Estimate
- —
- Work order
- —
- Stipulated completion
- —
What happened
- Paid (gross / net)
- ₹1.70 Cr / ₹1.57 Cr
- Bills
- 1 · 29 Dec 2016 → 29 Dec 2016
- Final bill
- none recorded
- Status
- Running bill only (no final bill found)
Why this case deserves follow-up
Examined and set aside on this project:
- document reuse (explained): the shared work order / agreement is one package contract worth ₹7.50 Cr; payments on this job and 151-16-000019 total ₹7.48 Cr (100% of it), consistent with one contract booked under several job codes.
Possible legitimate explanations
- One contract funded under two job codes (split budget heads).
- A wrong upload (document classification error).
What would resolve it
- Work-order ↔ job-code register for both jobs
- Budget-head allocation for each job
- Bill abstracts of both jobs
Questions an investigator could ask
- Is the agreement attached to job 151-16-000025 the same contract as the one on 151-16-000019? If so, why is it booked under two job numbers?
- How much of the contract value was paid under each job number?
- Is the work described under each job number physically distinct?
Specific records to request (RTI)
- Work-order ↔ job-code mapping and budget-head allocation — job 151-16-000025 and 151-16-000019; same agreement / work order attached to both. Why: Shows whether one contract was split across job numbers.
Evidence
IFMS work bills for this job: 56524
Investigation lead, not an accusation. Every statement on this page is generated from the published case data (JSON).