Case file · KP6-304-20-000212
set asideSame contract documents under different job numbers
This project was reviewed and set aside: every issue was explained, was an artefact, or rests only on low-confidence evidence
Project
Comprehensive Development of Arterial, Sub arterial roads in and around Koramangala in BTM Layout Assembly Constituency. (Package No 2018-19 S15) Annexure-2 Sl No 542 543 545
Job 304-20-000212 · Roads · location not stated · Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
Contractor: M RAMESH · paid to, per IFMS bills: M RAMESH ₹16.04 Cr (2021-04-27 → 2022-08-03); TEJUS CONSULTANTS ₹3.52 L (2022-05-19 → 2022-05-19)
What was promised
- Contract / work-order value
- not read (unknown)
- Estimate
- —
- Work order
- —
- Stipulated completion
- —
What happened
- Paid (gross / net)
- ₹16.08 Cr / ₹15.10 Cr
- Bills
- 7 · 29 May 2021 → 23 Nov 2022
- Final bill
- none recorded
- Status
- Running bill only (no final bill found)
Why this case deserves follow-up
Examined and set aside on this project:
- document reuse (artefact): the only file shared with other jobs is a 'Not Applicable' placeholder PDF.
Possible legitimate explanations
- One contract funded under two job codes (split budget heads).
- A wrong upload (document classification error).
What would resolve it
- Work-order ↔ job-code register for both jobs
- Budget-head allocation for each job
- Bill abstracts of both jobs
Questions an investigator could ask
- Is the agreement attached to job 304-20-000212 the same contract as the one on 304-15-000370, 304-15-000371? If so, why is it booked under two job numbers?
- How much of the contract value was paid under each job number?
- Is the work described under each job number physically distinct?
Specific records to request (RTI)
- Work-order ↔ job-code mapping and budget-head allocation — job 304-20-000212 and 304-15-000370, 304-15-000371; same agreement / work order attached to both. Why: Shows whether one contract was split across job numbers.
Evidence
IFMS work bills for this job: 421294, 442835, 460818, 484958, 493593, 517104, 535927
Investigation lead, not an accusation. Every statement on this page is generated from the published case data (JSON).